The Reasonable Adjustment · Case law

Medical cannabis in the courts

Decisions concerning prescribed cannabis, medicinal use and cannabis medicines. Each entry explains the connection to medical cannabis and links to the official judgment.

Core cases directly address medical use. Related cases consider it within a wider dispute. The collection includes historical medical-necessity and commercial cases; relevance labels do not indicate precedent or a favourable outcome.

Clear filters

12 decisions · Newest decision first

Core relevance · Employment Appeal Tribunal

Jack Truman v SPL Powerlines UK Limited & Ors

[2026] EAT 54 · 1 May 2026

Prescribed medical cannabis, a positive workplace drug test and disability discrimination are central to the appeal.

Related relevance · Family Court (B - district and circuit judges)

R, S, T (Perplexing Presentations: Findings and Welfare), Re

[2026] EWFC 194 (B) · 23 April 2026

Legitimately prescribed cannabis, alleged self-medication and its claimed effect on parenting are materially considered in welfare findings.

Related relevance · Family Court (B - district and circuit judges)

Bristol City Council v M & Anor

[2026] EWFC 91 (B) · 20 March 2026

Prescribed medicinal cannabis and reduced illicit use form part of the court’s welfare and substance-use assessment.

Related relevance · First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Transport

Hamza Malik v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors

[2026] UKFTT 383 (GRC) · 18 March 2026

A recent prescription application and cannabis-based prescriptions form part of the context, but the decision centres on prolonged unlawful supply and fitness to remain an approved driving instructor.

Related relevance · First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights

Cefyn Jones v The Information Commissioner

[2026] UKFTT 141 (GRC) · 26 January 2026

Medicinal-cannabis legalisation and alleged policy influence define the information request, while the appeal turns on the BBC journalism derogation.

Related relevance · Family Court (B - district and circuit judges)

F v M & Ors

[2025] EWFC 433 (B) · 24 November 2025

A private prescription, non-collection of it and subsequent street-cannabis use are material to the court’s assessment of parenting risk.

Related relevance · Family Court (B - district and circuit judges)

Cheshire East Borough Council v Mother & Ors

[2025] EWFC 470 (B) · 29 July 2025

A short period of prescribed medicinal cannabis is considered within wider findings about cannabis use, mental health and parenting capacity.

Related relevance · High Court (Family Division)

DE v FG

[2025] EWHC 666 (Fam) · 20 March 2025

Prescribed liquid cannabis is considered within a longer history of cannabis use and the welfare assessment.

Related relevance · High Court (Business List)

Louisa Mojela v Canmart Ltd & Anor

[2023] EWHC 2668 (Ch) · 30 October 2023

The parties operate in the medical-cannabis industry, though the legal dispute concerns company and commercial matters.

Core relevance · Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Quayle & Ors v R

[2005] EWCA Crim 1415 · 27 May 2005

The appeals directly address whether medical necessity can defend cannabis cultivation, possession or importation.

This is a selected collection from Find Case Law, whose coverage is incomplete. Connected judgments may be separate entries in the same dispute. Read the judgment and any later decisions before relying on a case.