NPA Monitoring My Website

While I’ve been waiting for a proper response to my pre-action correspondence regarding serious equality and data protection breaches, it turns out the National Pharmacy Association’s own network has been busy doing something else entirely. Visiting my website.

Yes, I Logged It

On 29 August 2025 between 14:49 and 14:51 UTC, multiple visits were made to The Reasonable Adjustment from an IP address registered to NPA’s ASN (AS197320). Pages visited included:

• My contact page
• The advocacy overview
• Case posts specifically referencing IPS Pharma

Firewall log evidence preserved, 29 August 2025

The fingerprinting logs are clear. Same device. Same screen resolution. Same browser. Same network. No attempt to mask the activity. Just a quiet little visit while ignoring my emails.

They Read, But Do Not Reply

This is what makes it interesting. I’ve submitted full settlement proposals, an updated schedule of loss, and raised fresh evidence showing what I believe to be victimisation and withdrawal of service by IPS Pharma. And yet… silence.

Not a single substantive reply, nor even a confirmation of receipt — despite the fact I had cc’d their generic legal address. But they do have time to browse my advocacy site?

Why This Matters

I’m not naïve. I expect scrutiny. This is a legal dispute. But when you monitor an individual’s public interest reporting platform during active pre-action correspondence, and do so without disclosure or lawful basis, that crosses a line.

It raises the question: is this about defending a claim, or profiling the claimant?

The Irony Is Rich

NPA Insurance exists to manage risk. Yet in choosing to quietly monitor a disabled claimant’s site rather than engage with the serious legal issues raised, they have created new risk for themselves. Reputational, procedural, and possibly regulatory.

My logs do not lie. If anything, they’re impartial witnesses.

For the Record

I have not attached the detailed firewall logs to this post — but I have preserved them. If NPA wants to know what else I captured, they are welcome to ask. Or, more wisely, respond to my respectful correspondence.

This story isn’t about drama. It’s about patterns. And this pattern tells a bigger story about what institutions do when faced with a disabled person who refuses to go quietly.