Published: 15 August 2025 | By: Kieron JH
Greggs is known for its sausage rolls, seasonal coffees, and social justice PR. Their reputation for inclusive hiring and second chances has won them accolades and public trust. But behind the branded smiles and LinkedIn graphics lies a quieter question:
What happens when one of your trusted employment partners is accused of mistreating a disabled service user?
Apparently, not much. At least, not if you’re Greggs.
The Greggs Job That Silently Disappeared
What makes this case more troubling is that Greggs was the only employer I had applied to through The Recruitment Junction (TRJ).
The role was for a database position. I had been shortlisted for interview, and the closing date for applications was 14 July 2025.
However, just one week earlier – on 7 July – TRJ abruptly withdrew all support, following my respectful feedback about their handling of reasonable adjustments. Within days, I was locked out of all contact. By 14 July, the same day the job closed, my Greggs Careers account was completely deleted.
This raised serious questions – not just about employment access, but data handling. In writing, TRJ had told me they had not shared my data with third parties or requested its deletion. And yet, the only third party involved in that application – Greggs – deleted my account completely.
To this day, I have received no explanation from Greggs or TRJ about how or why this happened.
Silence Isn’t Neutrality
Over the past month, I’ve sent more than ten lawful, professionally worded emails to [email protected] and [email protected]. These weren’t rants or threats. They were:
- Subject Access Requests (SARs) under UK GDPR
- Safeguarding concerns about TRJ
- Evidence-based references to funding contradictions, email blocks, and equality breaches
I made it clear that this was not a personal attack on Greggs. I even praised their public commitment to inclusive hiring. I simply raised concerns – calmly and lawfully – that a partner organisation may have failed to uphold those values.
Only one response was ever received:
“We have received your request.”– Greggs Data Protection Analyst, 6 August 2025
Since then, nothing. No clarification, no basic acknowledgment of the safeguarding concerns, and no explanation about the deletion of my account — during a live application process I had been shortlisted for.
Greggs Was Informed of the Following
Greggs was made aware – in writing – of:
- The sudden and retaliatory withdrawal of support from a disabled individual referred via Probation.
- The deletion of my Greggs Careers account during an active application process.
- Contradictory statements by TRJ about data access and deletion.
- Evidence of public funding being received by TRJ, despite public claims to the contrary.
I also offered to share a full press pack of documentation, including:
- Emails from the Employment Advisory Service (EAS)
- Statements from public funders
- Archived communications with TRJ
- GDPR and Equality Act references relevant to the case
There was no interest shown. Just silence.
Silence Is a Strategic Choice
This isn’t just disappointing – it’s revealing. When organisations claim to champion rehabilitation, inclusion, and dignity – but go silent when that commitment is put to the test – it tells us everything we need to know.
Silence in the face of documented discrimination is not professionalism. It’s protectionism.
I never asked Greggs to fix the problem. I asked them to acknowledge it. To show basic courtesy. To clarify whether their internal processes aligned with their stated values. Instead, I was met with what many marginalised individuals are used to: calculated indifference.
Why I’m Publishing This
Because people deserve to know how brands behave when no one is watching. Because disabled, neurodivergent, and criminalised individuals often have no recourse except transparency.
And because if companies can delete your account, withdraw opportunities, and never answer your emails – all while claiming to support the very people they quietly erase – then someone needs to call it out.
So here I am. Calling it out.
Author: Kieron JH
Platform: The Reasonable Adjustment
Lived Experience Advocate | Neurodivergence, Disability, Data Rights




Be First to Comment